Chemical company fined

Chemical company fined for dangerous gas release

4 February 2016

Multi-national chemical producer, Solvay Solutions UK Limited, has been fined after a dangerous gas was released into the atmosphere causing disruption to the M5 and thousands of homes nearby.

Warley Magistrates’ Court heard how an uncontrolled release of dangerous substances put both employees and members of the public at risk. During the incident the police set up road closures in the vicinity of the site; local sections of the M5 were closed by the Highways Agency,  and an estimated 4,500 people were asked to stay indoors for 2-3 hours.

The dangerous gas was phosphorus and phosphine which, upon contact with air, spontaneously ignited to produce phosphorous pentoxide. This reacted with the moisture in the air to produce a mist of phosphoric acid which drifted to a densely populated area.

An investigation carried out by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) into the incident, which occurred  at Trinity Street, Oldbury on 2 January 2009, found that a welded steel bar (‘rodder’) failed at the weld and broke in two. One piece fell back and the other piece pulled clear, leaving an opening through which the dangerous substance escaped.

The incident was reported to the European Commission.

Solvay Solutions UK Limited, formerly Rhodia UK Limited, was fined a total of £333,000 and ordered to pay costs of £110,000 after pleading guilty to an offence under Sections 2(1) and 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974.

Solvay had failed to properly assess and act upon the risk of the rodder failing.

HSE inspector Kay Brookes, said: “This was a long and complex case, but at the heart of it lay the fact that this company’s actions caused an incident that affected the public and workers.

“The loss of containment and failure in Solvay’s systems caused huge disruption and the outcomes could have been far worse.

“This case should serve as a warning to other companies dealing with harmful substances that they need to get their processes absolutely right, in order to ensure the safety of the public, if they don’t they will face the consequences.”

Marc Lidderth, area environment manager for the Environment Agency that supported HSE’s prosecution said: “In our role as environmental regulator and as part of the COMAH Competent Authority, we fully support HSE’s action in bringing this case.

“Environmental and health and safety law set out clear requirements for operators to make sure they take the appropriate steps to run their sites safely, so that people and the environment are properly protected.

“This case is an example of how we take direct action against companies that fail to do this, break the law and create an unacceptable risk to the community.”

For more information about control of dangerous substances visit:[1]

Notes to Editors: 

  1. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is Britain’s national regulator for workplace health and safety. It aims to reduce work-related death, injury and ill health. It does so through research, information and advice, promoting training; new or revised regulations and codes of practice, and working with local authority partners by inspection, investigation and enforcement.[2]
  2. More about the legislation referred to in this case can be found at: link to external website[3]
  3. HSE news releases are available at[4]